Galapagos « Terug naar discussie overzicht

Galapagos augustus

3.278 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 160 161 162 163 164 » | Laatste
aossa
0
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

Investor68 schreef op 6 augustus 2015 13:25:

What a nonsense opinion from these so-called analysts, Jan de Kerpel en Joost van Beek, with their ridiculous "koersdoel" of 55 and 33 Euro per share for Galapagos. I wonder who made these people analysts? Are they really serious? Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and good business acumen and who truly understands the nature of Galapagos’ business and potential knows full well that Galapagos is worth far more than 33 or 55 Euro per share. Galapagos has proven that it can deliver good results. I suggest that these so-called analysts should look for another job. Investors in Galapagos are far more intelligent and sophisticated to allow themselves to be influenced by such miserable "koersdoel" from Jan de Kerpel and Joost van Beek
No, you do not read it right.

it is €133
aston.martin
1
quote:

FC Barcelona schreef op 6 augustus 2015 13:36:

[...]

ik denk ; vrijdag ; stranddagje voor Gala personeel ! vanwege de team spirit en de mooie toekomst !
Beachvolley op de Grote Markt in Mechelen misschien. Da's ook een soort strand maar dan dichterbij.

[verwijderd]
0
133 Euro sounds better for now. Though I expect Galapagos to trade up to 250 Euro within two years from now if the company is not taken over before then.
[verwijderd]
0
Zit toch wel een pluk computerhandel bij lijkt mij al dat geneuzel van kopen/verkopen en weer terugtrekken en iemand die aan zichzelf koopt/verkoopt.

Nog iets concreets nieuws gehoord, iemand?
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

Investor68 schreef op 6 augustus 2015 14:21:

133 Euro sounds better for now. Though I expect Galapagos to trade up to 250 Euro within two years from now if the company is not taken over before then.
why? Without any explanation such statements are as useful as ducks in a whorehouse.
[verwijderd]
0
In case anyone wonders 'ducks in a whorehouse'? Their quacking is entertaining, but they give terrible, worthless blowjobs.
_Giulietta_
0
Dat was een kort vragenrondje, blijkbaar weinig tot geen interesse in deze financiële update.

Logisch! It's all about the pipeline!
_Giulietta_
0
quote:

Chicken Little schreef op 6 augustus 2015 14:24:

[...]
why? Without any explanation such statements are as useful as ducks in a whorehouse.
What is there to explain? Or were you just very much looking forward in using this comparison that you just seized whatever opportunity would land at your feet? :)
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

_Giulietta_ schreef op 6 augustus 2015 14:30:

[...]

What is there to explain? Or were you just very much looking forward in using this comparison that you just seized whatever opportunity would land at your feet? :)
if someone throws out a prediction/expectation for a stock, I'd like to know the reasoning behind it. Otherwise, why share.

(And I really can't comprehend the second part of your comment)
twinkletown
0
quote:

twinkletown schreef op 6 augustus 2015 10:59:

Ook belangrijk: Galapagos heeft voor 35,6 miljoen euro aan vorderingen openstaan bij de Franse overheid en bij de Belgische overheid voor 22,4 miljoen euro.

Vraag voor de forumleden: Ontvangt Galapagos ook nog de aanvullende betaling van 5 miljoen euro van het Amerikaanse Charles River labaratories? Dit bedrag zou worden overgemaakt als aan bepaalde omzetdoelstellingen van het eerste jaar -dus na de overname van Argenta en Biofocus per 1 april 2014- is voldaan.
Heeft er nog iemand van de financiele mensen geinformeerd tijdens de webcast naar de 5 miljoen;(eventueel) nog te ontvangen van Charles River Labaratories?
Staycalm
0
Is niet aan de orde geweest. Wel een vraag naar de relatie met Servier, omdat die niet genoemd werden in het persbericht. Volgens de CFO is de relatie met Servier heel goed en loopt dat programma naar wens.

De sterke kaspositie wilden ze vanuit strategisch oogpunt.

Vertrouwen is groot bij het management.
_Giulietta_
0
quote:

Chicken Little schreef op 6 augustus 2015 14:41:

[...]
if someone throws out a prediction/expectation for a stock, I'd like to know the reasoning behind it. Otherwise, why share.

(And I really can't comprehend the second part of your comment)
He oviously gave an expectation based on GLPG eventually launching filgotinib by themselves or reeling in the royalties from Abbvie. As we all are quite actively following GLPG you should very well know that such expectation - though uncertain, blue sky scenario, hence biotech - are very realistic.

The fact that you can't comprehend my general comment implies that you really didn't get Investor68 or as I attempted to imply just felt like responding to the first general comment available as it hardly made any sense at all.

As of your daily 2ish o' clock quite useless (thought must say often humoristic) comments we could say exactly the same, why share.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

_Giulietta_ schreef op 6 augustus 2015 15:02:

[...]

He oviously gave an expectation based on GLPG eventually launching filgotinib by themselves or reeling in the royalties from Abbvie. As we all are quite actively following GLPG you should very well know that such expectation - though uncertain, blue sky scenario, hence biotech - are very realistic.

The fact that you can't comprehend my general comment implies that you really didn't get Investor68 or as I attempted to imply just felt like responding to the first general comment available as it hardly made any sense at all.

As of your daily 2ish o' clock quite useless (thought must say often humoristic) comments we could say exactly the same, why share.
thank you for your explanation.
3.278 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 160 161 162 163 164 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 6 feb 2025 14:01
Koers 22,340
Verschil +0,480 (+2,20%)
Hoog 22,340
Laag 21,900
Volume 22.505
Volume gemiddeld 112.201
Volume gisteren 70.959